A resigned idealist
Jul. 30th, 2012 11:28 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
soniaThere's this pernicious idea floating around that if one "attracts" an abuser, or, even worse, a string of them, one is thinking bad thoughts or self-sabotaging or ignorant about boundaries or ... you get the idea. One is Doing Something Wrong and it is All One's Fault. Right down to "you choose your parents."
I find that this idea has permeated my thinking about my own history, and I keep fighting it down through the layers. (Except the parents bit. That got a gut-level "no!" from the beginning.) Fundamentally, I reject it because believing it sends me into an unproductive, unresolvable tailspin. Setting it aside gives me a sense of relief and stability.
When someone else tries to lay it on me, one of my responses is, "When you get wet almost every time you go outside, you might have done something to annoy the weather gods and deserve punishment - or you might live in Portland. It rains a lot. On everyone." By analogy, there are a lot of abusers out there, and a lot of cultural permission for abusive behavior.
Somewhere along the way, I acquired the idea that communities avoid or eject damaging people and protect their vulnerable members. Not sure where I picked that up, but in practice I found that communities avoid or eject people who call out damaging behavior, and protect their powerful members. While continuing to say that the recipients of damage must be doing something wrong.
I'm watching the ReaderCon discussion develop, and I admire the people who are speaking up in support of making ReaderCon a safe(r) space for women.
At the same time, I realize how much I've become resigned. Where do we even start? Let's say this one manipulator is permanently banned from this one event once a year. Is it possible for any but the tiniest groups to remain free from predatory behavior?
Which leads to the other problem, which is that none of us are all good or all bad. At the same time, some of us are trying a whole lot harder than others to behave honorably, kindly, with respect for others and ourselves.
I find that this idea has permeated my thinking about my own history, and I keep fighting it down through the layers. (Except the parents bit. That got a gut-level "no!" from the beginning.) Fundamentally, I reject it because believing it sends me into an unproductive, unresolvable tailspin. Setting it aside gives me a sense of relief and stability.
When someone else tries to lay it on me, one of my responses is, "When you get wet almost every time you go outside, you might have done something to annoy the weather gods and deserve punishment - or you might live in Portland. It rains a lot. On everyone." By analogy, there are a lot of abusers out there, and a lot of cultural permission for abusive behavior.
Somewhere along the way, I acquired the idea that communities avoid or eject damaging people and protect their vulnerable members. Not sure where I picked that up, but in practice I found that communities avoid or eject people who call out damaging behavior, and protect their powerful members. While continuing to say that the recipients of damage must be doing something wrong.
I'm watching the ReaderCon discussion develop, and I admire the people who are speaking up in support of making ReaderCon a safe(r) space for women.
At the same time, I realize how much I've become resigned. Where do we even start? Let's say this one manipulator is permanently banned from this one event once a year. Is it possible for any but the tiniest groups to remain free from predatory behavior?
Which leads to the other problem, which is that none of us are all good or all bad. At the same time, some of us are trying a whole lot harder than others to behave honorably, kindly, with respect for others and ourselves.
no subject
Date: 2012-07-31 10:30 pm (UTC)I'm afraid you're right that it's hard to create a "safe" space with hard boundaries, because we are neither all kind or all cruel.
I have no answers, but share your dismay.
no subject
Date: 2012-08-01 05:13 am (UTC)